Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Stability through simplicity

I gave a talk last week at Oppenheimer Funds in NYC. I met some great people there, really creative and open minded. I spoke on the general theme of this blog -- natural instabilities in finance and economics and ideas we need to understand them.

One question asked afterwards was "what can we do as far as regulations to cope with these kinds of instabilities?" As I recall, my answer was pretty lame. I tried to suggest (vaguely) that the answer probably lies not with highly complex regulations, but with simpler ones, but I didn't say much more. I've been thinking about that point since, and thought it might be worth writing a few things down.

Essentially, the first lesson I think we should draw, once we acknowledge the existence of pervasive instabilities in finance, is the need to deal with persisting uncertainty. We will never understand the terrain so well that we can reduce the future to a set of known possibilities to which we can assign specific probabilities (which standard economics assumes we can). We can and should work hard to explore the space of what might happen, and so gain some forewarning of dangers, but we will still encounter surprises and we should expect to do so. So our approach to regulation ought to be centered on that premise -- that we face a world of uncertainty.

I should have read Andrew Haldane's wonderful essay The Dog and the Frisbee before giving my talk, but I only got around to that this morning. He makes some hugely important points on this very topic. The essay is one extended argument for why financial regulation is now too complex, and why our best hope at achieving financial stability in the future probably lies in a vast simplification of the regulatory apparatus and system of rules.

He begins from the observation that, in many settings where decision making involves weighing up many conflicting factors, simple rules often out-perform more complex ones:
Among physicians diagnosing heart attacks, simple decision trees beat a complex model. Among detectives locating serial criminals, simple locational rules trump complex psychological profiling. Among investors picking stocks, simple passive strategies outperform complex active ones. And among shopkeepers understanding spending patterns, repeat purchase data out-predict complex models.

The general message here is that the more complex the environment, the greater the perils of complex control. The optimal response to a complex environment is often not a fully state-contingent rule. Rather, it is to simplify and streamline (Gigerenzer (2010)). In complex environments, decision rules based on one, or a few, good reasons can trump sophisticated alternatives. Less may be more.

In complex environments, tallying strategies have been found to be superior to risk-weighted alternatives. Take avalanche prediction. Avalanches are difficult to predict, as they are drawn from a fat-tailed (Power Law) distribution. Yet simple tallying of a small number of avalanche indicators has been found capable of predicting over 90% of historical accidents. It has also been found to be superior to more complex decision methods (McCammon and Hägeli (2007)).
Haldane goes on at length to consider this in the context of financial regulation, where the legal framework has really exploded in complexity over the past few decades. The pursuit of ever-more complex models to assess risks, whether used by regulators or by banks and financial institutions independently, has led to a proliferation of models that create an overwhelming fog of complexity and can blind us all to obvious risks:
During the 1990s, the bluntness of the risk judgements embodied in Basel I came increasingly to be questioned – and arbitraged. Basel I was perceived as lacking risk-sensitivity, at least by comparison with the new wave of credit and market risk models emerging at the time. Change came in 1996 with the Market Risk Amendment. This introduced the concept of the regulatory trading book and, for the first time, allowed banks to use internal models to calculate regulatory capital against market risk. ...With hindsight, a regulatory rubicon had been crossed. This was not so much the use of risk models as the blurring of the distinction between commercial and regulatory risk judgements. The acceptance of banks’ own models meant the baton had been passed. The regulatory backstop had been lifted, replaced by a complex, commercial judgement. The Basel regime became, if not self-regulating, then self-calibrating.

The ink was barely dry on Basel II when the financial crisis struck. This exposed gaping holes in the agreement. In the period since, the response has been to fill the largest of these gaps, with large upwards revisions to the calibration of the Basel framework. Agreement on this revised framework, Basel III, was reached in 2010. In line with historical trends the documents making up Basel III added up to 616 pages, almost double Basel II. ... The length of the Basel rulebook, if anything, understates its complexity. The move to internal models, and from broad asset classes to individual loan exposures, has resulted in a ballooning in the number of estimated risk weights. For a large, complex bank, this has meant a rise in the number of calculations required from single figures a generation ago to several million today (Haldane (2011)).

Taking all of this together, the parameter space of a large bank’s banking and trading books could easily run to several millions. These parameters are typically estimated from limited past samples. For example, a typical credit risk model might comprise 20-30 years of sample data – barely a crisis cycle. A market risk model might comprise less than five years of data – far less than a crisis cycle.

Viewed over an historical sweep, this pattern is even more striking. Contrast the legislative responses in the US to the two largest financial crises of the past century – the Great Depression and the Great Recession. The single most important legislative response to the Great Depression was the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. Indeed, this may have been the single most influential piece of financial legislation of the 20th century. Yet it ran to a mere 37 pages. The legislative response to this time’s crisis, culminating in the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, could not have been more different. On its own, the Act runs to 848 pages – more than 20 Glass-Steagalls. That is just the starting point. For implementation, Dodd-Frank requires an additional almost 400 pieces of detailed rule-making by a variety of US regulatory agencies.
Haldane ends the essay with some exploration of how we might reverse this trend, and manage to simplify regulations. I won't go into detail other than to second his suggestion that reducing the complexity of the financial system itself ought to be a principle target of such simplified regulations. But even before that, changing the mindset of financial economics is the first task. That mindset still remains fixated on the endless pursuit of optimal strategies by long calculations over risk weighted alternatives, when in reality we rarely know the risks or even the alternatives with much accuracy.

An important consequence of thinking in this world of known risks and optimal solutions is that we end up accepting some dubious arguments that we can achieve the best of all possible worlds with the right pricing mechanism. With bad assumptions, in other words, we fall into the trap of believing the economists' standard models, when they really have little to do with the real world. If we break free of this illusion, and face up to living in a world with real uncertainty, we may return to an era in which old-style regulations and prohibitions against certain activities make perfect sense, and dreams of perfect pricing mechanisms become evident as the fantasies they are:
Over the past 30 years or so, the regulatory direction of travel has been towards pricing risk in the financial system, rather than prohibiting or restricting it. In the language of Weitzman, regulators have pursued price over quantity-based regulation (Weitzman (1974)). That makes sense when optimising in a risky world.

It may make less sense when optimising in an uncertain world. Quantity-based restrictions may be more robust to mis-calibration. Simple, quantity-based restrictions are the equivalent of a regulatory commandment: “Thou shalt not”. These are likely to be less fallible than: “Thou shalt provided the internal model is correct”. That is one reason why Glass-Steagall lasted for 60 years longer than Basel II. Quantity-based regulatory solutions have gained currency during the course of the crisis. In the US, the Volcker rule is a quantity-based regulatory commandment: “Thou shalt not engage in proprietary trading”. In the UK, the Independent (“Vickers”) Commission on Banking has also proposed structural, quantity-based reforms: “Thou shalt not co-mingle retail deposit-taking and investment banking”.

Yet even these notionally simple, structural proposals run some risk of backdoor complexity. For example, the consultation document accompanying Volcker already runs to 298 pages. Were these proposals to become mired in detail, they risk sinking, like the Tower of Basel, into the swamp. This is not because these proposals go too far but because they may not go far enough. These reform efforts have too many commas, semi-colons and sub-clauses. They would benefit from a few more full stops.


  1. Hi,
    Blogs are good for every one where we get lots of information for any topics nice job keep it up !!!
    Assignment Service Provider
    Assignment Help and Writing Service

  2. Thanks for sharing the information with us.I also bookmark your site and visit it in future for more info.Buy Assignment Help | Assignment help experts

  3. Very well written article. It will be helpful to everyone who employee it, including me. Keep up the good work - can't wait to read more posts. Homework Help
    Homework Hel Onlinep

  4. At the very 1st, I’d favor to state thanks to you for this enlightening article. Second, I'd prefer to wonder wherever I can learn a lot more info concerning your post. I arrived right here via Bing and can't discover any associated web websites connected to this matter. How do I sign for your web blog? I had prefer to stick to your updates as they arrive along!
    I'd a query to interrogate but I forgot what it absolutely was... anyways, thank you very much.

  5. Wonderful website, Very informative regarding pixel gun 3d gaming. how to hack pixel gun 3d gives hack for the same. Visit to get hack for pixel gun 3d for free. Keep sharing.

  6. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well Assignment help| Need Assignment help

  7. Hello! I really appreciate your content. Its quite informative for various purposes. Howevere, I would like to suggest about an Australian Assignment help company, that is famous among students by the name Online Assignment Expert. So, the company that is Australia-based, consist of a team of more than 4000 highly skilled expert writers, who all are PhD holders from different reputed universities. Happily, I would like to tell tthat I am one of those writers and i am myslef associated with the team for last & years. Online Assignment Expert is offering their highly professional online assignment help services, to students that feel challenges in understanding concepts of subject study or fail to secure desired grades in precious b academics. The team has been working round the clock, to provide best acadmic assiustance at most reasonable price. Any student who feel the need for conceptual understanding can choose for one-on-one session services for better understanding. Also, we are offering free samples of almost all subjects for students on our website. Our team do extensive research on even the easiest of assignment help and prepare 100%authentic, plagiarism free work. To assure assignment quality, we use Quality Check Resource Enterprise System that examines assignments with 100%accuracy. Thus, for urgent assistance kindly visit our website or write to us at

  8. Awesome blog!! Thank for providing excellent information. Actually quite helpful data accessible here. If you are looking for assignment help then you can visit our site....
    auditing assignment
    australia assignment help
    online assignment help

  9. Excellent medicinc. Very interesting to read. I really love to read such a nice article. Thanks! keep rocking. 먹튀검증


  11. When I read your article on this topic, the first thought seems profound and difficult. There is also a bulletin board for discussion of articles and photos similar to this topic on my site, but I would like to visit once when I have time to discuss this topic. 온라인슬롯

  12. Hey what a brilliant post I have come across and believe me I have been searching out for this similar kind of post for past a week and hardly came across this. Thank you very much and will look for more postings from you. 먹튀검증 and I am very happy to see your post just in time and it was a great help. Thank you ! Leave your blog address below. Please visit me anytime!

  13. Depending on your success in The Quest, you may win up to two free bonuses during each round of the promotion. The bonus will be credited as soon as you reach the goal set for you. 카지노사이트
    One of the important conditions for participating in the online promotion is that you must opt-in.

  14. It is amazing and wonderful to visit your site.Thanks for sharing this information. 온라인카지노

  15. Thanks for picking out the time to discuss this, I feel great about it and love studying more on this topic. 토토

  16. Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good results. If you know of any please share. Cheers! 안전토토사이트

  17. "Hello, I am one of the most impressed people in your article. I’m very curious about how you write such a good article. Are you an expert on this subject? I think so. Thank you again for allowing me to read these posts, and have a nice day today. Thank you."


  18. That's why marketing and advertising that you simply applicable exploration previous to publishing. It will be easy to write down superior write-up that way. 바카라사이트

  19. A good blog always comes-up with new and exciting information and while reading I have feel that this blog is really have all those quality that qualify a blog to be a one. 파워볼

  20. My Academic Helps is a professional online assignment writing service provider based in Australia. They have hired a team of reliable Subject Matter Experts, who provide complete guidance at every step to students who are struggling with writing their course assignments. My Academic Helps is the one-stop solution to get all your assignment-related queries resolved in minimum time.
    Services Offered:

    C & C++ Programming Assignment Help

    R Programming Assignment Help

    Neurosurgery Nursing Assignment Service

    Neurosurgery Nursing Assignment Service

    Mobile Application Development Assignment Help

  21. This is a very interesting post. Thank you for posting a lot of interesting posts. And please visit my site!~! The name of the site is 슬롯사이트 .

  22. thanks for sharing this amazing post i really liked it. Bathroom Renovation Dubai